<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Grappling with Guns</title>
      <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2007</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:40:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Xmas Ruger</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img alt="XMasRuger.jpg" src="http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/XMasRuger.jpg" width="300" height="162" />

Happy holidays from Grappling with Guns. This year I got two early presents, a Ruger MKIII678 for target practice (and maybe some rabbit hunting in the future) and a gun case from <a href="http://www.cabelas.com/cabelas/en/templates/links/link.jsp?id=0026824226586a&type=product&cmCat=Search_Results_NYR&returnPage=search-results1.jsp&QueryText=bullet+proof+gun+case&N=4887&Ntk=Products&Ntx=mode+matchall&Nty=1&Ntt=bullet+proof+gun+case&noImage=0">Cabella's</a>.
My wife got me the case and I got myself the gun.  I took the Ruger out to the range along with my S&W M&P compact  chambered in .40  S&W. It's nice to have a .22, although don't delude yourself that getting a .22 will reduce your ammo cost.  I shot the same amount of .40 caliber ammo as I did the last time I went to the range. I just added a couple hundred rounds of .22 to the bill!

I hope you all have a great holiday, and I hope you find something nice under your tree.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/12/xmas_ruger.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/12/xmas_ruger.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Teacher comes out</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This week katu news published a story indicating the Oregon teacher seeking the right to carry at school released her identity.  The article is available online at <a href="http://www.katu.com/news/10193211.html">http://www.katu.com/news/10193211.html</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/10/teacher_comes_out.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/10/teacher_comes_out.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 03:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Kahr in Portfolio magazine</title>
         <description><![CDATA[There is a fascinating article in the October issue of Conde Nast Portfolio about Kahr arms and its founder, Justin Moon, the son of Rev. Sun Myung Moon.  The elder Moon is the founder of the Unification Church, a group also known more derogatorily as "the Moonies."

The article is pretty fair in its description of some of the predominant ideas held in the gun community, citing self reliance and explaining the concepts surrounding self defense.  The author, Christopher S. Stewart, acknowledges that he is not a gun person, but incorrectly describes gun rights as solely a conservative political concern describing himself as perceived as 'the democrat' (a moniker Moon uses to chide the author) while visiting the Shot Show in Orlando.

Where the article goes out on a limb is in it's speculation that the Kahr company is part of a Unification Church conspiracy to "presumably," in the words of the author, control its territory in a catastrophic contest between good and evil.  I'm not sure that the evidence is contained in the article to support such an implication.  Stewart summarizes comments by former members as saying "The gun business, along with food companies, real estate, and other holdings, will serve to protect the fortress and keep sinners at bay."  That's a pretty big accusation without a whole bundle of support.

There is clear evidence that security in the Kahr factory needs to be increased. An employee illegally stole (one offense) and smuggled gun parts not yet stamped with serial numbers (a second offense), assembled guns from the parts, and sold (a third offense) the guns to other criminals (fourth offense). It's clear the employee was doing something illegal, and that the company should take measures to stop theft. However, if the religion were trying to use Kahr to build a personal arsenal, as the article's author implies, why would the company be at the shot show and in commerce selling legally produced and stamped firearms?  There is no evidence that the company was facilitating the trade of illegal firearms.

The article is also a bit sensational, describing the company as manufacturing "some of the smallest and most lethal weapons on earth." Are they more lethal than a hand grenade?  Are they more lethal than a radioactive pill purported to have been used last year to kill a former Russian spy? If the author replaced the word "weapon" with "gun," what makes a gun more lethal?  Is it caliber, is it concealability, is it accuracy? A longer barrel is more accurate, and someone shooting a small gun is more likely to "pull" their shots, missing their target, than with a larger grip and longer barrel. This comment seems unsupported and irresponsible.

I had a run in with the Moonies when I was studying dance in New York in the 90's.  I was hanging out in a park near NYU when a young man approached and asked me a number of questions - do I believe in diversity and equality, do I believe the world can become a better place?  I did believe in all of these things, and so I accepted an invitation to a "student event" in a building just down the street.  The guy I met was really nice and very smart.  He had come from Germany to study at NYU, and I had studied German and enjoyed the opportunity to talk with him.  We had a great dinner and the group moved into a slide show about issues around the globe.  About five slides in the speaker said "And here's a picture of Reverend Moon meeting with members of Congress." As soon as I saw the slide I knew this wasn't a NYU student organization.  The presentation went on about Moon and how he had founded this student organization. I was out of there as quickly as I could after the slideshow ended.  The nice guy I met wanted me to go for a week to their upstate New York campground to learn more about the group, but there was no way I was going to stick around.

Does that group have anything to do with a scheme to use Kahr arms to defend the Unification Church in an apocalyptic crisis?  I don't know.  I know I didn't want to have anything to do with the group.  There was a lot of pressure, and the 'no strings attached' communicated when I first met the guy in the park was a lot different than the message that night at their event. However, it seems unethical to imply that Kahr might be a part of an apocalyptic vision without clear evidence that weapons are being collected or that some kind of training is being conducted by the Unification Church proper.


For those of you who don't subscribe to Portfolio, the article is available on line.  It is worth a read.  I'm interested to hear what you think.

<a href="http://www.portfolio.com/careers/features/2007/09/17/Unification-Church">http://www.portfolio.com/careers/features/2007/09/17/Unification-Church</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/09/kahr_in_portfolio_magazine.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/09/kahr_in_portfolio_magazine.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Oregon teacher&apos;s carry rights</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This is an "old" story, but an interesting one. In Medford, Oregon at the beginning of September a teacher was confronted by her employers who asked her if she was carrying her handgun after they became aware of her concealed carry permit.  There is a story on the
<a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/118949018187870.xml&coll=7">Oregon Live</a> website.  It is worth a look.  On page three several officials indicate that the state carry law seemingly trumps individual rules.

My gym, for example, has a "no weapons on site" rule, and while I don't carry at the gym out of respect for this rule and because I signed the contract agreeing to it, I would prefer to carry.  I usually go to work out with my wife about 4 or 4:30 in the morning, and we have stumbled across drug deals and other unsavory folks.  The "no weapons" means neither my wife or I can carry mace, a taser, a handgun or any other means of protection to or from the gym.

I am interested to hear how the lawsuit by the instructor plays out in the Oregon school district, and I wonder whether or not this would impact the right of businesses to require “no weapons” policies in contracts with licensed individuals.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/09/oregon_teachers_carry_rights.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/09/oregon_teachers_carry_rights.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Ethos, logos and pathos</title>
         <description><![CDATA[What kinds of arguments are we making as gun owners?  Classical rhetoric classifies arguments into three categories of persuasion, ethos (appeals based on the character of the communicator), logos (appeals based on logic and reasoning), and pathos (appeals founded on emotion).  Of course, we participate in all three, but we can look at and be careful about the kinds of arguments we participate in.

If I say, “My favorite class to teach is Power, Ethics, and Design, and I am a safe and proud gun owner,” I am relying on ethos.  I am saying, “Look I’m educated, I think things through, and so you can rely on me to have thought through gun ownership before choosing to buy a firearm.”  The folks at Of Arms and the Law, lawyers who examine precedent, constitutional rights, and case law to argue in support of gun rights rely partially on ethos – they are highly educated lawyers, so their opinion should matter.

There are other ethos-driven arguments in the gun community.  There’s the “I’m a common guy an’ I like common things.  I talk straight, shoot straight, I love natural things, and ain’t nobody gonna pin me down.”  It is an ethos that emphasizes simplicity, directness – the breath of fresh air in the face of politics.  

Unfortunately, a lot of politicians have played this hand, to the point that most people don’t trust what’s under the surface of this authenticity-based ethos.  The point is we have to look at how we build our ethos and who is using our ethos.  If we want to express something with integrity we need to understand both what it means to act with integrity and what it means to convey a message with integrity.

We all also participate in logos, appealing to audiences through logic at one time or another.  Academics, the news, and lawyers like this approach to supporting an argument.  Dave Kopel, the research director for the Independence Institute, is probably the strongest author in the gun-rights movement, but a lot of gun bloggers have been taking more of this approach in the past couple of years.  I’m glad to see our logos driven arguments becoming stronger.

Pathos, the use of emotion to support a position, is one we don’t use often.  In Bowling for Columbine, Michael Moore’s movie about the failed-bombing-turned-shooting at Columbine high school, there is a scene where he meets with Charlton Heston to discuss the shooting of one six-year-old child by another, shortly before Heston holds an NRA rally in Flint, Michigan near where the event occurred.  Moore was making an argument driven by pathos, while Heston tried to respond with ethos arguing he owns guns based on rights and tradition.  

What kinds of arguments could we make based on pathos?  I think some of the stories on my website do a bit of that.  I think some of the double gun bird and game magazines make such pathos driven arguments.  I’m wondering if there are more arguments based in emotion in support of gun rights that might cross-over to touch the non-gun enthusiast.


For definitions of logos, ethos and pathos visit <a href="http://www.rpi.edu/dept/llc/webclass/web/project1/group4/">http://www.rpi.edu/dept/llc/webclass/web/project1/group4/</a>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/ethos_logos_and_pathos.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/ethos_logos_and_pathos.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>M&amp;P40c Free clips!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img alt="M%26P40c.jpg" src="http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/M%26P40c.jpg" width="300" height="194" />

When I bought my compact M&P in .40 caliber I didn't know Smith & Wesson was offering free clips with the purchase of a new M&P or Sigma.  I got home on June 2nd from picking up the pistol from <a href="http://www.theplacetoshoot.com/" target="_blank">The Place to Shoot</a>, the indoor range where I'm a member, and logged in to the S&W website to see if there were any downloads or additional information about my new gun.  On the front page I saw the offer.  I was elated.  Not only had they designed a top contender in contemporary pistol design, but their pricing and rewards beat any deal in town.

When the clips arrived I appreciated that both clips had the pinky grip base plate included.  In the photo the last clip with a flat base plate was the backup clip that came when the gun shipped.  For concealed carry I can wear the gun with the flat base plate, and use the other three as backups.  

Thanks Smith and Wesson!

Unfortunately, the offer just ended.  Maybe they'll create an even better fall offer, just to make me jealous...
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/mp40c_free_clips.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/mp40c_free_clips.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Off on a tangent</title>
         <description>For the past week I&apos;ve been off doing &quot;other&quot; non-blog related things - hitting the gym at 4 in the morning (not exactly sure how that happened, but it did) and getting ready for the start of my MBA program. 

(So, that means, get up when my wife gets me up, [maybe that&apos;s how the 4am trip to the gym started] toss my M&amp;P in the hip pouch [not really toss, but place safely and carefully] go to the gym for an hour or two, come home, shower, read for school, leave the gun with my wife, go to work, come home, spend time with my dear spouse, read, go to bed, repeat).

On gun bloggers websites it sure seems that guns and personal defense are this big massive thing that is always there looming in the foreground, but in most ways it really isn&apos;t.  Personal defense is part of the mundane everyday.  

I was thinking the other day about one of the things I do each day before I carry.  I check in with my mental and physical state. Am I tired?  Am I frustrated?  Do I have a crick in my neck that will keep me from blocking an attack with a blunt object?  Does my knee hurt in a way that will keep me from dodging out of traffic should a car cut around a corner too sharply?  Safety is a lot more than just about having a tool like a gun or can of mace.  It&apos;s about being peaceful, self aware, and willing to defend yourself.</description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/off_on_a_tangent.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/off_on_a_tangent.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 01:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Explorers vs. Boy Scouts</title>
         <description>When I joined the Ames Police Explorers in eighth grade I had several reasons.  First, after my parent’s divorced my mother wanted me to have strong male role models.  This meant the Boy Scouts, where the play of Cub Scouts turned to discipline and discipline turned to manhood.

I hated the repetition and mental bluntness of the Boy Scouts.  Reciting, marching, standing in neat rows and saluting, sitting through boring meetings in the stagnant air of the Kiwanis’s club and working for merit badges alone with no father to guide, only increased my awareness of the separation Mother wanted the activities to fix..

The  Explorers was different.  Here was an opportunity, I thought, to really help people.  I could learn to be a stabilizing force in an unstable world.  I could walk the line between the good guys and the bad guys, and not only that, but I could do it with a gun at my side, itself a symbol of security and enforcement to those whose flaws didn’t contain the taint of criminality.

It was an easy solution in my mind, and it gave me an out with my mother.  I could quit the Boy Scouts.
</description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/explorers_vs_boy_scouts.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/explorers_vs_boy_scouts.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">myth vs. reality</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Grappling with Guns 1</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<em>Spade addressed Gutman: "I hope you're not letting yourself be influenced by the guns these pocket-edition desperadoes are waving."

Gutman opened his eyes.  Cairo stopped whispering and stood erect behing the fat man's chair.

Spade said: "I've practiced taking them away from both of them, so there'll be no trouble there."</em>

Dashiell Hammett, <em> The Maltese Falcon</em>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/grappling_with_guns_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/grappling_with_guns_1.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">myth vs. reality</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Kowen’s team decides to go unarmed</title>
         <description><![CDATA[When being interviewed about an undercover operation to get exeutives out of occupied Kuait just prior to the first Gulf War, an operative describes choosing <em>not</em> to carry.

“If you somehow get stopped uh by a security person as an example and you’ve got a weapon, immediately there is the implication that there is something wrong.
The one time in Beruit (referring to an earlier operation) that we had weapons with us, they were silent weapons, ironically… uh, we pulled them.  And uh fortunately it was an instance where we didn’t have to use them, but it just highlighted once again that if you have a weapon what you might do in a normal situation if it gets dicey and you don’t have a weapon you think of a way to get out and if you do have a weapon  you’ll pull your weapon and uh right away you’ve raised your profile.”*

Here's to creativity over lowest common denominators.

*From Silent Warriors: 2 Escape from Saddam on the Discovery Channel
<a href="http://shopping.discovery.com/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10000&catalogId=10000&langId=-1&productId=30403&partnumber=672808">http://shopping.discovery.com/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10000&catalogId=10000&langId=-1&productId=30403&partnumber=672808</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/kowens_team_decides_to_go_unar.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/kowens_team_decides_to_go_unar.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">myth vs. reality</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 01:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Great post at Guntards</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Change is in the air!  Siminov has brought a guest writer going by the handle QuestionEverything into the fold.  QE is acting to ferrit out current news stories on guns, gun rights, and democracy.  As he writes, "You could say I’m going to be his spotter on the battlefield of ideas, helping him line up thousand-yard rhetorical shots against the gun-grabbing hordes." 

Check out his first post at <a href="http://www.guntards.net/breaking-news-at-this-hour">http://www.guntards.net/breaking-news-at-this-hour</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/great_post_at_guntards.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/great_post_at_guntards.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog news</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>SiCKO</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img alt="bowling_for_columbine_3.jpg" src="http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/bowling_for_columbine_3.jpg" width="485" height="265" />

Michael Moore’s new movie, SiCKO has been just released.  I like Michael Moore.  Bowling for Columbine really made me think hard about guns.  As my reader’s know, I walked away from shooting at the age of 16 after a friend was coerced by a parent into committing a gun crime.  

As I watched Bowling, I felt that in terms of logic, Charlton Heston won the day.  In the scene where Moore interviews Heston, Moore confronts Heston with the fact that the NRA held a rally in Moore’s hometown just after an elementary school girl had been shot by a fellow student who had brought his dad’s gun to school. The emotion Michael Moore felt and expressed at the tragedy of a child being shot by another child didn’t seem to have a lot to do with whether or not guns should be regulated, but more about how parents teach their children how to be safe, or how parents take safety precautions with their dangerous tools.

The entire film was filled with the same logical flaws.  Moore indicates that Canada is loaded with guns, but has less gun violence, then wonders what the difference is, surmising that we in the US should illegalize guns.  The missing link – culture – is obvious to most of us.  Illegalizing things won’t help if violent cultures cannot be changed.

So, like I said, I like Michael.  It's thanks to him and his film in part that I feel safe in owning, maintaining and carrying loaded firearms.  I've got the missing link - a peaceful culture.

I’m worried that after watching SiCKO that I’m going to see more of Moore’s bad logic.  I’m in support of a strong social net and government mediation of medical costs, and I’ll be damned if a good/bad movie by Mr. Moore is going to muck that up!
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/sicko.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/07/sicko.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 19:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Since Everyone&apos;s posting links to Front Sight for thousands of $ worth of free training...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I thought I'd post a link to some <em>useful</em> defensive training. <a href="http://www.ffkg.com" target="_blank"> Rich Daniel </a>over at FFKG has three DVDs out that detail his live fire/airsoft training approach.  He has people practice drill-based exercises on a live fire range <and> has them practice simulations against live attackers using airsoft.  Everything is at contact distance in the airsoft exercises, and the emphasis is placed on footwork, using punches, strikes and grappling where needed, and getting distance from your attacker so that your firearm can actually be an effective tool to end the fight.

Yes, I have to admit he's a friend of mine - I started going to their rental range, <a href="http://www.theplacetoshoot.com" target="_blank">The Place to Shoot</a> in 2002, but I've watched the videos and done the exercises, and I'm willing to bet my life on them.  Now, if only I can convince him to give me THOUSANDS of dollars worth of free training I might be on par with all the other gun bloggers out there :)
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/06/since_everyones_posting_links.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/06/since_everyones_posting_links.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 20:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Portland man defends home</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Last night a Portland man, Leroy Hudson, shot an intruder who was in the process of breaking into his home.  The intruder was unarmed, but when confronted by the homeowner, the intruder moved toward him.  The homeowner shot the intruder in the head.  The intruder is now at a local hospital.

Oregon law only allows personal defense to protect life and limb.  It will be interesting to watch this case to see if prosecutors pursue it.  

The intruder is known to police, according to Koin news, and has a previous arrest record.

Read the story at <a href="http://www.koin.com/Global/story.asp?S=6729900" target="_blank">Koin</a> and at <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/118317396852560.xml&coll=7" target="_blank">Oregon Live.</a>

Just yesterday I saw Katu running a story at 4:30 on the laws about defense with a firearm in the home.  I missed the report, but I wonder if they will recap it today.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/06/portland_man_defends_home.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/06/portland_man_defends_home.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Joining</title>
         <description>When I joined the Ames Police Explorers in eighth grade I had several reasons.  First, after my parent’s divorced my mother wanted me to have strong male role models.  This meant the Boy Scouts where the play of Cub Scouts turned to discipline and discipline turned to manhood.
I hated the repetition and mental bluntness of the Boy Scouts.  Nationalistically reciting the pledge of allegiance, standing in neat rows and saluting, sitting through boring meetings in the stagnant air of the Kiwanis’s club and working for merit badges alone with no father to guide, only increased my awareness of the separation the activities were supposed to fix.

The Police Explorers were different.  Here was an opportunity, I thought, to really help people.  I could learn to be a stabilizing force in an unstable world.  I could walk the line between the good guys and the bad guys, and not only that, but I could do it with a gun at my side, itself a symbol of security and enforcement to those who didn’t have the flaw of criminality tainting their person.

It was an easy solution in my mind, and it gave me an out with my mother.  I could quit the Boy Scouts.</description>
         <link>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/06/joining.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.grapplingwithguns.com/archives/2007/06/joining.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Police Explorers</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
